June 2009 - Posts
Sure, almost anything goes these days on television, but should viewers have to cringe during the commercials, too? Let's discuss the ads that really should get an R-rating. And if this blog post lasts more than four hours, see a doctor.
CONTINUED >>
We've discussed misheard lyrics before, but how come so many lyrics just don't make sense, even when they're heard correctly? Let's take them to task.
CONTINUED >>
So let me get this straight. In 2009, People’s Hottest Bachelor is 23-year-old Chace Crawford. And the actor most likely to star in this year’s biggest box office hit is either 19-year-old Daniel Radcliffe, in “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,” or 23-year-old Shia LaBeouf in “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.”
CONTINUED >>
You didn't have to have a hit television show or a world-famous hairdo or a zillion-selling poster to relate to Farrah's struggle. In her life she entertained us, and in her death, she reminded us of what's really important.
CONTINUED >>
Our commercial contest continues, with discussion of those ads that split the audience. Some people love 'em, but others can't lunge for the remote fast enough.
CONTINUED >>
I'd say I'll miss Dr. George O'Malley on "Grey's Anatomy," but everything that made the character charming vanished long ago.
CONTINUED >>
In these trying economic times, it’s tough to see mediocrity rewarded with piles of money. Whether the benefactor is a banking CEO or, well, an actor, there’s a certain amount of headshaking. Which is why I was struck by Forbes list of Hollywood’s top-earning actors for 2008.
CONTINUED >>
It's that time again: As summer kicks in, I'm starting up my annual TV commercial contest.
There aren't really many, if any, rules. We hash out the good, the bad and the ugly of recent commercials in posts and comments here, and when we're done, I choose the best and the worst TV commercial of recent months. (Your comments greatly inform the decision, but the final choice ends up being mine alone ... there's just no other way to do it.)
We try to stick to ads that debuted in the last six months, though that's not a hard-and-fast rule. Ads that have won in the past can't win again, and we try not to repeat discussion of them.
Inevitably, people will leave comments about how ignorant we are for chatting about commercials when they don't own a TV and instead sit around reading Dostoyevsky in the original Russian. The words "get a life" will be used. People will introduce this newfangled concept of "TiVo" and suggest we fast-forward every single ad. Others will attack any criticism of a bad ad, saying that the sheer fact that the commercial is remembered means that it did its job. Yes, yes. Heard it all before. I'm sure I'll approve some of those comments anyway -- I do every year -- but I'm hoping they'll be kept to a minimum. I still get a huge kick out of this contest or I wouldn't be continuing the tradition.
After all, just when you think nothing on TV can surprise you, you stumble upon an ad like the one that overwhelmingly won our best-commercial honor last year, the Discovery Channel's lovely "Boom-di-ada" ("I love tornadoes, I love ara-ch-nids, I love hot magma, I love the giant squids!" ) It's a near-perfect ad, and in a world where we can usually find three times as many bad ads as good ones to discuss, it was a much-needed gem.
I cheated last year when it came to the worst-commercial honor, giving it not to one ad, but to a spokesman. BILLY MAYS FOR OXI CLEAN! BILLY MAYS FOR ORANGE GLO! BILLY MAYS FOR SCREAMERS OF THE WORLD, UNITE! Mr. Mays takes that nice happy buzz I had from watching the Discovery Channel ad and STOMPS ON IT AND THEN THROWS IT RIGHT OUT THE WINDOW! But anyway, he can't win again. Or lose again. Whatever.
Here are the other past winners/losers.
2007
2006
2005
2004
And I'll just throw out one topic to get you started: What is up with those new Liberty Mutual ads? I've admitted to loving the ones LM has a new series
The notable thing about these ads is that they're really not in context. You see a snippet of a scene that feels more like a TV drama than an ad. Most memorable for me: Siblings sharing that dad wandered off again and one asks what the other plans to do about it. "What do I plan to do? You're PART OF THIS FAMILY!" screams the woman. (Note: I swear I saw this one, but now there's a tamer one where she says something different.) And here's the kicker: The New York Times says
I guess I should appreciate the ads for being honest and not denying bad times. But not only do they confuse me about what they're selling, I kind of feel like a kid whose mom and dad are fighting and want to go hide under the bed. They feel raw and personal, which is obviously intended. But do they sell the company's products? And even if they do, do they go too far?
Discuss the Marlowes or any other ad that's bugging or thrilling you these days in the comments.
I’m not going to lie. I watch a lot of television. But even with cable and my DVR, it’s simply impossible to watch everything. But this being summer, I decided to give four shows that I never normally watch a chance to impress me.
CONTINUED >>
How about another Multi-link Monday? I offer up five fun, time-wasting links, and you should feel free to suggest others in the comments.
• I really can't be too mean about Awkward Family Photos this weirdly elaborate . And I really want to know the rules of this board game
• Just another June bride, smokin' like a chimney Not a Cough in a Carload."
• Check out Runpee.com
• Just don't have time for a theater-length film? Movies in Frames the one for "Midnight Cowboy."
• Have you seen "Han Solo, P.I."
If you weren’t a kid in the ‘70s, you really missed something special: The world of Sid and Marty Krofft. The release of the new “Land of the Lost” movie has been hitting my nostalgia button bigtime.
CONTINUED >>
Of all the canceled shows that karma really should have treated more kindly, “My Name Is Earl” tops the list.
CONTINUED >>
